Erik's web

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

MF Digital, myths or facts? - The 16 bit issue, truth or myth?

E-mail Print PDF
Article Index
MF Digital, myths or facts?
Collecting more photons
Comparing the top of the line MF back with the top of the line DSLR
Is Capture One better on IQ180 files?
A larger format is less demanding of the lens
The Really Right Stuff
OLP (AA) filtering
The 16 bit issue, truth or myth?
Do MFD have better DR?
MFDBs have better color, truth or myth?
Flexibility
Summary and conclusions
Are large pixels better?
Read also
Experts's comments
Thanks!
All Pages


The 16 bit issue, truth or myth?

One of the claims oftem made for MF is the use of 16 bits. The simple truth is that this is pure nonsense. The number of useful bits is the same as DR. As we have seem above, DR for MFD is around 11.5 EV while for DSLRs it can approach 14 EV. It is very much possible that MF backs use 16 bit pipeline. This may be due to the fact that standard components are normally 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit or 64-bit designs. A 12 bit pipeline cannot be built with standard components. DSLR vendors use ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) optimized for the available data. MFDBs use a 16 bit pipeline to transport 11-12 bits worth of data. So talking about 16 bitness is a marketing truth, in common speak known as a lie.




Last Updated on Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:56  

Statistics

OS : Linux u
PHP : 5.2.9
MySQL : 5.0.67
Time : 02:37
Caching : Enabled
GZIP : Disabled
Members : 1510
Content : 72
Web Links : 1
Content View Hits : 398055

Login

Banner1

J!Analytics